| Author |
Message |
cookdav
|
|
|
Post subject: (solved) Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6.36?
 Posted: 19.11.2010, 06:21
|
|
Joined: 2010-10-08
Posts: 22
Location: Manchester,NH and Sarasota,FL
Status: Offline
|
|
I have 2 laptops w/aptosid, and each are up-to-date
within the last day or two. Both run 32-bit, and were
installed from same Live-DVD.
Yet, their kernels are different versions. Why?
Quote:
Host/Kernel/OS "siduxlap" running Linux 2.6.35-4.slh.8-aptosid-686 i686 [ sidux 2010-01 Ύπνος - kde-lite - (201006131622) ]
CPU Info (1) Intel Core2 Duo T5870 @ 2048 KB cache flags( sse3 ht nx lm ) clocked at [ 2001.000 MHz ]
(2) Intel Core2 Duo T5870 @ 2048 KB cache flags( sse3 ht nx lm ) clocked at [ 1200.000 MHz ]
Videocard Intel Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller X.Org 1.7.7 [ 1366x768@60.0hz ]
Network cards Realtek RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit
Intel PRO/Wireless 5100 AGN [Shiloh]
Processes 129 | Uptime 5min | Memory 145.7/2880.5MB | HDD FUJITSU MJA2250B Size 250GB (33%used) | Client Shell | Infobash v3.34
Quote:
Host/Kernel/OS "sidux-laptop" running Linux 2.6.36-0.slh.5-aptosid-686 i686 [ sidux 2010-01 Ύπνος - kde-lite - (201006131622) ]
CPU Info Intel Celeron M 520 @ 1024 KB cache flags( sse3 nx lm ) clocked at [ 1596.293 MHz ]
Videocard Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller X.Org 1.7.7 [ 1280x800@60.0hz ]
Network cards Realtek RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+
Broadcom BCM4311 802.11b/g WLAN
Processes 139 | Uptime 6:20 | Memory 569.5/1508.8MB | HDD Hitachi HTS54168 Size 80GB (63%used) | Client Shell | Infobash v3.34
|
_________________
[ Win-8.1 sucks. ]
LAPTOP: [ Win-10 isn't looking much better...time to go back to Aptosid ! ]
Last edited by cookdav on 26.11.2010, 17:01; edited 2 times in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
ibgb
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6.36?
Posted: 19.11.2010, 06:58
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 42
Status: Offline
|
|
Well, as a first guess...
Perhaps you don't have the kernel meta package (linux-image-2.6-aptosid-686 and it's corresponding header package: linux-headers-2.6-aptosid-686) that automatically pulls in the newest available kernel installed on the laptop running the older kernel? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
slam
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6.36?
Posted: 19.11.2010, 09:21
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 607
Location: w3
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
devil
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6.36?
Posted: 19.11.2010, 09:23
|
|
Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
or is one just lacking an apt-get update?
greetz
devil |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cookdav
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6.36?
Posted: 19.11.2010, 13:13
|
|
Joined: 2010-10-08
Posts: 22
Location: Manchester,NH and Sarasota,FL
Status: Offline
|
|
|
slam wrote:
Did not manually remove the kernel meta-packages we provide (or set some holds)?
Did you use a 3rd-party maintenace script on those systems?
Greetings,
Chris
@Devil: There are NO pending dist-upgrades on either system.
[Thought I stated that in base-post.]
@Slam: Not that I recall. What would be the NAME of such a meta-package?
No, no holds that I knowingly set. And, no, no
3rd-party tools...I do 'apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade' at run-level-3, to update my systems.
Am I correct in assuming that the system at 2.6.35 SHOULD have
upgraded to 2.6.36? (I just re-tried dist-upgrade on it,
to be sure that it's current.)
Is there a meta-package-name that I can try to install that would then cause the 2.6.35 system to upgrade its kernel? |
_________________
[ Win-8.1 sucks. ]
LAPTOP: [ Win-10 isn't looking much better...time to go back to Aptosid ! ]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
devil
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6.36?
Posted: 19.11.2010, 14:21
|
|
Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
linux-image-2.6-aptosid-686
linux-headers-2.6-aptosid-686
greetz
devil |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cookdav
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6.36?
Posted: 20.11.2010, 03:41
|
|
Joined: 2010-10-08
Posts: 22
Location: Manchester,NH and Sarasota,FL
Status: Offline
|
|
|
devil wrote:
linux-image-2.6-aptosid-686
linux-headers-2.6-aptosid-686
greetz
devil
Yes, they're both installed:
Quote:
linux-image-2.6-aptosid-686:
Installed: 2.6.35-25
Candidate: 2.6.35-25
Version table:
*** 2.6.35-25 0
500 http://debian.tu-bs.de/project/sidux/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[Ditto for the 'headers' pkg.] |
_________________
[ Win-8.1 sucks. ]
LAPTOP: [ Win-10 isn't looking much better...time to go back to Aptosid ! ]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cookdav
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6.36?
Posted: 20.11.2010, 03:42
|
|
Joined: 2010-10-08
Posts: 22
Location: Manchester,NH and Sarasota,FL
Status: Offline
|
|
| [quote="cookdav"]
devil wrote:
linux-image-2.6-aptosid-686
linux-headers-2.6-aptosid-686
greetz
devil
Yes, on 2.6.35-kernel laptop, they're both installed, according to 'apt-cache policy':
Quote:
linux-image-2.6-aptosid-686:
Installed: 2.6.35-25
Candidate: 2.6.35-25
Version table:
*** 2.6.35-25 0
500 http://debian.tu-bs.de/project/sidux/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[Ditto for the 'headers' pkg.]
It's a Lenovo ThinkPad, 1 year old. |
_________________
[ Win-8.1 sucks. ]
LAPTOP: [ Win-10 isn't looking much better...time to go back to Aptosid ! ]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6
Posted: 20.11.2010, 11:18
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 469
|
|
Then on your currently 2.6.35 kernel PC, you either
1) have not rebooted yet after upgrading the kernel
or
2) you have rebooted with older 2.6.35 kernel. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
dpt
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs 2.6
Posted: 20.11.2010, 16:40
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 281
Location: New Delhi
Status: Offline
|
|
| Use kernel-remover to have only one kernel. |
_________________
In a lunatic asylum, everyone thinks that he is the doctor.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
jet|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.11.2010, 17:30
|
|
Joined: 2010-11-20
Posts: 1
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
|
|
LAPTOP: sidux/Kubuntu10.04/Vista
video:Intel945
LAPTOP#2: Win-7/sidux
Did you update Grub from the Kubuntu-Installation? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.35 vs
Posted: 20.11.2010, 20:09
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 469
|
|
|
dpt wrote:
Use kernel-remover to have only one kernel.
This, is not a good advice.
It's better to keep at least one old kernel that's known to work well. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cookdav
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.3
Posted: 23.11.2010, 23:10
|
|
Joined: 2010-10-08
Posts: 22
Location: Manchester,NH and Sarasota,FL
Status: Offline
|
|
Not sure exactly, but somehow the 'gpg' key for the sidux repo isn't getting recognised. Has
to do with some similar threads I found where some others were also having problem where
'keyring' package (with slh's new key for aptosid) didn't get installed or updated.
Anyway, now that I KNOW/SEE the problem, I'm not gonna bother to try to fix it. I'll be doing
a fresh install in a month or so, and the problem will get fixed from that.
Thanks for all the help/ideas! Marking this one solved. |
_________________
[ Win-8.1 sucks. ]
LAPTOP: [ Win-10 isn't looking much better...time to go back to Aptosid ! ]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2.6.3
Posted: 24.11.2010, 00:01
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 469
|
|
| #apt-get install aptosid-archive-keyring |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cookdav
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Two laptops: diff kernels: 2
Posted: 26.11.2010, 16:53
|
|
Joined: 2010-10-08
Posts: 22
Location: Manchester,NH and Sarasota,FL
Status: Offline
|
|
|
muchan wrote:
#apt-get install aptosid-archive-keyring
Thanks, I had gotten that far, but get an error from that, and
haven't figured out exactly why yet:
Quote:
Fwiw, the line from my 'sidux.list' repo defn file is:
Quote:
deb http://debian.tu-bs.de/project/sidux/debian/ sid main contrib non-free fix.main fix.contrib fix.non-free
|
_________________
[ Win-8.1 sucks. ]
LAPTOP: [ Win-10 isn't looking much better...time to go back to Aptosid ! ]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
