| Author |
Message |
cge-nogo
|
|
Post subject: kernel 2.6.35 and nic e1000e - no link
 Posted: 14.09.2010, 06:25
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
Hey,
nice to see development continue with a new name. But I got a problem after du with the new kernel 2.6.35.
My network interface eth0 got no link anymore. Ceni reconfiguration doesn't help, but wireless is runnig without problems.
Any suggestions?
dmesg
=====
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 1.046346] e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 1.0.2-k4
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 1.046350] e1000e: Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009 Intel Corporation.
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 1.046381] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 1.046392] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 1.046487] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 1.316406] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x1)
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 1.316409] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 1.316429] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: MAC: 6, PHY: 6, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 10.289269] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 10.340136] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
syslog
======
Sep 14 07:54:29 kernel: [ 10.340463] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
dibl
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 14.09.2010, 13:45
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 302
Location: Dayton, Ohio, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
I cannot reproduce the problem with my e1000:
Code:
dibl@sidbox:~$ dmesg | grep e1000
[ 0.434218] e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 1.0.2-k4
[ 0.434220] e1000e: Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009 Intel Corporation.
[ 0.434235] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: Disabling ASPM L1
[ 0.434250] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
[ 0.434265] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
[ 0.434430] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 0.434594] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: Disabling ASPM L0s
[ 0.518375] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x1) 00:1c:c0:1f:54:35
[ 0.518377] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
[ 0.518446] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: eth0: MAC: 2, PHY: 2, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
[ 10.815244] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 10.866111] e1000e 0000:03:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 13.419974] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Code:
root@sidbox:/var/log# cat /var/log/syslog | grep eth0
.
.
.
Sep 14 13:37:29 sidbox kernel: [ 13.419974] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Sep 14 13:37:29 sidbox kernel: [ 13.420364] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
.
.
.
My system (d-u this morning):
Code:
dibl@sidbox:~$ infobash -v3
Host/Kernel/OS "sidbox" running Linux 2.6.35-4.slh.9-aptosid-amd64 x86_64 [ sidux 2009-03 Μώμος - kde-lite - (200911110039) ]
CPU Info (1) Intel Core2 X6800 @ 4096 KB cache flags( sse3 ht nx lm vmx ) clocked at [ 2926.000 MHz ]
(2) Intel Core2 X6800 @ 4096 KB cache flags( sse3 ht nx lm vmx ) clocked at [ 1596.000 MHz ]
Videocard nVidia GT200 [GeForce GTX 260] X.Org 1.7.7 [ 1600x1200@50.0hz ]
Network cards Intel 82573L Gigabit
Processes 147 | Uptime 8min | Memory 516.0/3964.8MB | HDD WDC WD1002FBYS-0,WDC WD7500AAKS-0,WDC WD1500AHFD-0 Size 1900GB (47%used) | GLX Renderer GeForce GTX 260/PCI/SSE2 | GLX Version 3.3.0 NVIDIA 256.44 | Client Shell | Infobash v3.34
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DeepDayze
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 14.09.2010, 14:49
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
| Does Ceni see it? Why not reconfigure it with Ceni to see if it works |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cge-nogo
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 05:53
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
| I tried reconfiguration with ceni and it recognize the interface. So I can setup a static ip address, but still no link (eth0: link is not ready). Pinging the interface works but no other network device. This is clear because there is no link to the switch. Its like a deactivated interface. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
michaaa62
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 06:24
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 55
Location: Berlin, Germany
Status: Offline
|
|
May be you need firmware-linux or even firmware-linux-nonfree installed to make this nic work?!
Sorry i do not remember exactly how i got this working on one of my previous notebooks  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
slh
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 11:10
|
|
Joined: 2010-08-25
Posts: 949
Status: Offline
|
|
Intel e1000/ e1000e (in contrast to e100!) network cards don't require any loadable firmware, furthermore e1000 (PCI cards) and e1000e (PCIe core) drivers differ quite a lot and should not be mixed up.
Regarding the actual problem, I unfortunately can't help a whole lot, as I don't see any corresponding reports upstream nor can test it myself (only Intel 82541GI, e1000 here - working fine). A look through the complete dmesg output for unrelated (perhaps ACPI or MSI) messages might give further insight. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 12:04
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-15
Posts: 23
|
|
Try
# rmmod e1000e
# modrpobe e1000e
BTW, do you have full duplex 1000Mbit? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cge-nogo
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 16:15
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
|
birdie wrote:
Try
# rmmod e1000e
# modrpobe e1000e
BTW, do you have full duplex 1000Mbit?
Okay tried it, but still the same.
Kernel 2.3.35-9
Code:
syslog
======
kernel: e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 1.0.2-k4
kernel: e1000e: Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009 Intel Corporation.
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x1)
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: MAC: 6, PHY: 6, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
ethtool
=======
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Speed: Unknown!
Duplex: Unknown! (255)
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 1
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
MDI-X: Unknown
Supports Wake-on: pumbag
Wake-on: g
Current message level: 0x00000001 (1)
Link detected: no
Yeah I have full duplex 1000MBit with with Kernel 2.6.34-0
Code:
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Speed: 1000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 1
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
MDI-X: off
Supports Wake-on: pumbag
Wake-on: g
Current message level: 0x00000001 (1)
Link detected: yes
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DeepDayze
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 18:56
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
Sounds like e1000e could be broken on 2.6.35?
I myself have an e1000 (no e) interface on my Thinkpad and it works fine. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
sidro
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 19:00
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 15
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
slh
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 19:05
|
|
Joined: 2010-08-25
Posts: 949
Status: Offline
|
|
| e1000e as a whole doesn't seem to be broken, not only does it work for dibl, I also see no relevant bugs upstream or elsewhere. However side effects of regressions in other subsystems (like I mentioned APCI and MSI support are prime candidates, among others) could impose subtile breakage on other drivers, like e1000e. Additional the exact chipset revision (lspci -nn | grep -i intel.*ethernet) would be interesting. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DeepDayze
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.09.2010, 19:16
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
cge-nogo, why not post the output of lspci -nn | grep -i intel.*ethernet as slh mentioned. There could be a variant that's not known about.
Another thing to check is the cable. Is it firmly plugged in? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cge-nogo
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 16.09.2010, 06:04
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
|
DeepDayze wrote:
cge-nogo, why not post the output of lspci -nn | grep -i intel.*ethernet as slh mentioned. There could be a variant that's not known about.
Okay this is the output:
Code:
lspci -nn | grep -i ethernet
00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82566MM Gigabit Network Connection [8086:1049] (rev 03)
DeepDayze wrote:
Another thing to check is the cable. Is it firmly plugged in?
I know you have to recomment that, but I wouldn't bother you if I didn't checked it before. And well with 2.6.34 it works fine. Sometimes I think I have old configuration somewhere around. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cge-nogo
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 16.09.2010, 07:04
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
| Okay bad news about my old configuration idea. I tried the new live cd and the same problem appears. Still no link. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
seasons
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 16.09.2010, 08:07
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 92
Status: Offline
|
|
It might have something to do with IRQ 19? Some systems have issues with that one. Do you see any errors/warnings with:
Code:
cat /var/log/messages |grep irq
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
