| Author |
Message |
etorix
|
|
Post subject:
 Posted: 12.05.2011, 20:53
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 138
Status: Offline
|
|
do NOT create a /run; it will fail
the new initscrppts will handle it, when ready |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
etorix
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.05.2011, 02:47
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 138
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeepDayze
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 15.05.2011, 03:20
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
etorix wrote:
UPDATE: new sysvinit Installed: 2.88dsf-13.6, implements /run, and populates it
seems works fine
Ditto...looks like this transition is finally complete |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
bentbear
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 19.05.2011, 00:54
|
|
Joined: 2011-05-19
Posts: 2
Location: usa
Status: Offline
|
|
i d-u'd 16may11. kernel 2.6.38 is unbootable while kernel 2.6.37 still boots. Cannot rd -r /run, "directory in use". Any other workarounds?
thanx, bentbear
p.s. running amd e-240 processor on satelite c655d-s5130 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
devil
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 19.05.2011, 07:02
|
|
Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Quote:
kernel 2.6.38 is unbootable while kernel 2.6.37 still boots.
are you sure, this is /run related?
do any errors or warnings point there?
greetz
devil |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Spaceferret
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 03:14
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 97
Status: Offline
|
|
I'm using Liquorix 2.6.38 and --
root@ethernity:/home/spaceferret# apt-cache policy udev
udev:
Installed: 168-2
Candidate: 168-2
Version table:
*** 168-2 0
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
and also /run directory, and everything's fine  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
slam
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 08:14
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 607
Location: w3
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
devil
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 08:56
|
|
Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
why would a unsupported Liquorix Kernel make the installed udev version of no value?
being unfriendly for the sake of it?
greetz
devil |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
slam
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 11:41
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 607
Location: w3
Status: Offline
|
|
Udev, kernel and initscripts are working together very closely, and ned to fit - as you definitely know, devil. Unsupported 3rd party kernels (and initscripts, etc) do have no support in our forums for exactly this reason, and - even more - no place in our official "Upgrade Warnings". Feel free to discuss them in "User Scripts & Dragons". This is very much in the interest of our users who expect and rely on officially supported advice.
Making this clear is not (and also not intended to be) unfriendly at all.
Thanks for understanding.
Greetings,
Chris |
_________________
an operating system must operate
development is life
my Debian repo
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
clubex
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 12:56
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 100
Status: Offline
|
|
I should have thought that spaceferret's input was of some value. It shows that aptosids udev, initscripts and a Liquorix kernel work together while they don't if you use aptosid kernel. Surely that's of interest to the devs and therefore the users and maybe even a basis to solve the op's problem.
By the way who are the official team? I don't see them listed anywhere Perhaps the list is on the website somewhere but I can't find it (won't be the first time I've missed something ). |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Spaceferret
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 13:00
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 97
Status: Offline
|
|
| Just a closing argument,Your Honor:-) It was not my intention to obtain an unsupported kernel should I succeed in having nvidia kernel module load with 2.6.38 slh which I never did despite all my desperate attempts, in my opinion it's better to use an unsupported kernel than not to be able to use my computer.I have 3 kernels installed and 2 of them boot into x with no problems whatsoever ( Liquorix and Frickelplatz ) and slh won't. Unfortunately. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Spaceferret
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 13:08
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 97
Status: Offline
|
|
| All this reminds me the policies of the former communist regimes.It doesn't matter that there's nothing to eat and family of 8 shares a one-bedroom apartment,it doesn't matter that everything is falling apart,as long as you follow ideology you are better off than those damn capitalists,so what if they are doing so much better, they don't live by out ideology and that is why they are cursed from the faith of Earth , I hope I won't be traced down and send to aptosid Gulag for using Damentz kernel (still better than our Canadian winter ) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
drb
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 13:27
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 96
Status: Offline
|
|
@Spaceferret
I managed to install the nvidia blob on the 2.6.38 slh kernels. At some stage nvidia appear to have updated the blob with the offending command |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 14:04
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 469
|
|
OT question but,
clubex wrote:
By the way who are the official team? I don't see them listed anywhere Perhaps the list is on the website somewhere but I can't find it (won't be the first time I've missed something :-) ).
http://manual.aptosid.com/en/credits-en.htm#cred-team
The list is not updated since devil had left the developers team so he's still listed there.
For @Spaceferret, you are free to use whatever kernel, whatever software on your PC.
But please don't advocate using them on Official forums of aptosid.
{ ...and this is not nvidia+kernel thread. Please stay on topic } |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
clubex
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 20.05.2011, 15:11
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 100
Status: Offline
|
|
muchan: Thank you. I just knew there just had to have been a list somewhere. I think it might be more appropriate to place the list in "Meet the Team" under the top left Menu.
Edit: I might put this forward in the Suggestions forum. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
