| Author |
Message |
Lat
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 02:12
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-19
Posts: 145
Status: Offline
|
|
| Shouldn't be a note in the news (side notes in this site) about not upgrading udev+initramfs -c? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
wofritz
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 05:33
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 30
Location: Uetze/NDS/DE
Status: Offline
|
|
|
DeepDayze wrote:
This must be quite a hard to find bug considering the varying reports.
One more data point: For me not only 2.6.39 crashes, but also the latest 2.6.38. This kernel was running before the d-u.
An older 2.6.36 kernel is still working.
Oh I just see that last d-u seems to have rebuilt initrd for 2.6.38 too:
Code:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10610678 4. Jan 18:33 initrd.img-2.6.36-2.slh.3-aptosid-686
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10682277 20. Mai 14:29 initrd.img-2.6.38-6.slh.1-aptosid-686
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10820792 20. Mai 14:31 initrd.img-2.6.39-0.slh.1-aptosid-686
Wolfgang |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
gerd
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 07:32
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 94
Status: Offline
|
|
|
piper wrote:
my 64 box gets me to the grub rescue screen with the error
Code:
error:symbol not found:'grub_divmo64_full'
Confirm this on my machine. A chrooted reinstall of grub helded.
Funny to chroot into luks+lvm from live cd...
This was the second time this was necessary in last months. Sure it was my last grub update
edit: in this thread udev and grub errors are mixed, but they are independent. I had my error with udev 168-2 (no update to 169) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
devil
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 08:11
|
|

Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
piper,
Quote:
error:symbol not found:'grub_divmo64_full'
that sounds more like a borked grub update from the day before to me
greetz
devil |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
slh
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 12:59
|
|

Joined: 2010-08-25
Posts: 585
Status: Offline
|
|
| fixed udev packages have now entered our repo, in case of already affected systems it's important to rebuild the broken initrds. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
arwa
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 13:18
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 183
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yes, great. Thank you, slh. After a simple dist-upgrade the initrd of kernel 2.6.39 was rebuild automatically (probably because a new version of initramfs-tools that also came in) and rebooting into this kernel works fine. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
devil
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 13:53
|
|

Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
same here. no need for manual build.
greetz
devil |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
DeepDayze
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 14:25
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 609
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
I confirm the fixed udev packages work for me and my laptop's now booting normally again.
Thanks slh for the fix |
Last edited by DeepDayze on 21.05.2011, 14:55; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
DonKult
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 14:49
|
|
Team Member

Joined: 2010-09-02
Posts: 416
Status: Offline
|
|
works for me, too.
Rebuild of initramfs is required for OLDER kernels. udev upgrade will only create a new initramfs for the current kernel. Older kernel-initramfs's are untouched. |
_________________ MfG. DonKult
"I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones." ~ The Doctor
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Sukarn
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 21:11
|
|

Joined: 2011-05-20
Posts: 7
Location: India
Status: Offline
|
|
Thanks slh.
+1 The fixed udev packages have fixed my broken kernel. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
DeepDayze
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 21.05.2011, 22:52
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 609
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
DonKult wrote:
works for me, too.
Rebuild of initramfs is required for OLDER kernels. udev upgrade will only create a new initramfs for the current kernel. Older kernel-initramfs's are untouched.
If you want to update the intrds for ALL your installed kernels (without booting into each one):
as root:
Code:
update-initramfs -u -k all
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
piper
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 22.05.2011, 19:59
|
|
Moderator

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 467
Location: cheektowaga, ny
Status: Offline
|
|
|
devil wrote:
piper,
Quote:
error:symbol not found:'grub_divmo64_full'
that sounds more like a borked grub update from the day before to me
greetz
devil
very possible, but no clues to what got borked as the update went smooth, no errors, but, that means nothing  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|