| Author |
Message |
DeepDayze
|
|
Post subject:
 Posted: 22.09.2010, 01:55
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
I have the problem, but it turns out irqbalance DOES actually start for me:
Code:
$ ps -ef|grep irqbalance
root 2318 1 0 21:47 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/irqbalance
rmdata 7556 7539 0 21:54 pts/1 00:00:00 grep irqbalance
Seems like that missing bang is a cosmetic bug to me |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Carnophage
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 22.09.2010, 06:35
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 59
Status: Offline
|
|
| Ok, so actually what does this error result in? To be honest I missed the information about the fail at start and didn't see any differences while using the system. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
start2usefrsidux
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 22.09.2010, 11:32
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 26
Status: Offline
|
|
So is it only 64bit.
And what damage does this bug cause?
Coz I'm on 32bit and ready to dist-upgrade. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
devil
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 22.09.2010, 12:21
|
|
Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
it seems to be purely cosmetic.
greetz
devil |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
dibl
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 22.09.2010, 12:21
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 302
Location: Dayton, Ohio, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
| Same as DeepDayze here -- I see the red error message during boot, but afterward the process is actually running. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
HeSaid
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 22.09.2010, 13:21
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 56
Location: southwest Florida, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
The irqbalance failure error on boot is NOT a real error. irqbalance is running with or without the bang.
a lot of fuss over nothing, but better to have alerted everyone...
--
Neal |
_________________
Registered Linux User # 159445
aptosid 64-bit Lenovo Thinkpad Edge
aptosid 64-bit HP dv6000 laptop
aptosid 32-bit eeePC 900A
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
oddball
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 22.09.2010, 18:45
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 109
Location: Skåne, Sweden
Status: Offline
|
|
|
start2usefrsidux wrote:
So is it only 64bit.
And what damage does this bug cause?
Coz I'm on 32bit and ready to dist-upgrade.
I have it on 64 bit and 32 bit. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
piper
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 22.09.2010, 22:46
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 481
Location: cheektowaga, ny
Status: Offline
|
|
| yes, both 32 & 64 bit |
_________________
debian sid | apt-get into it
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DeepDayze
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 23.09.2010, 00:08
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
| Think the lsb-base devs should put the bang back and then it'll fix that annoying error. Wonder why the bang was taken out anyway? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
drb
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 01.10.2010, 20:36
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 96
Status: Offline
|
|
| 3.2-25 now uploaded - has anyone successfully tried it? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
spacepenguin
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 01.10.2010, 21:21
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 98
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
|
|
| No irqbalance errors here anymore. |
_________________
Susan | Hardware: SysProfile | 32bit
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Jörg
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 04.10.2010, 08:57
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-14
Posts: 27
Location: Amsterdam
Status: Offline
|
|
| After DU of oct. 03, lsb-base has been updated to 3.2-25 and the "failed"-message concerning irq-balance at startup disappeared on my two computers. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
