| Author |
Message |
drb
|
|
Post subject: [SOLVED] Non-free flash plugin failing to load
 Posted: 25.10.2011, 10:20
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 96
Status: Offline
|
|
| After the d-u today (including the kernel update), the non-free flashplugin is crashing or not loading in Iceweasel and Chromium . . . but it runs in Opera . . . after which it runs in Iceweasel and Chromium till next time I open them up (sometimes just a few minutes earlier) when I have to run it in Opera first to get it to run in Iceweasel . . . . very strange . . . any ideas? |
Last edited by drb on 25.10.2011, 10:38; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
towo
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Non-free flash plugin failing to load
Posted: 25.10.2011, 10:30
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 522
Location: Pößneck / Thüringen
Status: Offline
|
|
| Du you use nvidia driver 290.03-1 from experimental? |
_________________
Code:
System: Host: Defiant Kernel: 4.15.0-towo.1-siduction-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Cinnamon 3.4.6
Distro: siduction 13.2.0 December - xfce - (201312310323)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
drb
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 25.10.2011, 10:38
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 96
Status: Offline
|
|
@towo
Yes!! I've just gone back to 285.05.09 and everything is fine |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DeepDayze
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 25.10.2011, 20:19
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
I have experienced this issue as well and rolling back to 285.05.09 works for me. Seems Flash has bad interactions with the 290 series and I may send a bug report to nVidia per their procedure to determine where the fault lies (Adobe or nVidia)
if it is an Adobe issue most likely this will go into their bit bucket considering their history relating to Flash on Linux |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
dibl
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 25.10.2011, 20:32
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 302
Location: Dayton, Ohio, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
Yep I saw the same issue with 290.03 and flash.
But where are you guys getting ver. 285.05.09? All I can find to revert to is "280.13.really.275.28-1" in the debian sid repo.
Thanks. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DeepDayze
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 25.10.2011, 23:52
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
dibl wrote:
Yep I saw the same issue with 290.03 and flash.
But where are you guys getting ver. 285.05.09? All I can find to revert to is "280.13.really.275.28-1" in the debian sid repo.
Thanks.
I was using a custom made package |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
slam
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 26.10.2011, 06:22
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 607
Location: w3
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clubex
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 26.10.2011, 08:34
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 100
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dibl
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 26.10.2011, 09:51
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 302
Location: Dayton, Ohio, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
| Ahhh ---- OK, thanks clubex. I've been having such good luck with the nvidia-glx packages, I think I'll just wait for the next one. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
