Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
mithatOffline
Post subject: aptosid Wikipedia article  PostPosted: 09.09.2014, 20:06



Joined: 2011-12-15
Posts: 25

Status: Offline
The first paragraph of the aptosid Wikipedia refers to aptosid in the past tense. There are a few other places in the article where it's referred to in the past tense as well. I was going to edit this but thought it might be prudent to check here first. To the best of my knowledge, aptosid is still not dead. Can anyone see any reason not to change the past tenseness in the article?
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
slhOffline
Post subject: RE: aptosid Wikipedia article  PostPosted: 09.09.2014, 20:36



Joined: 2010-08-25
Posts: 746

Status: Offline
Isn't it quite futile to argue about wikipedia semantics?

As far as aptosid is concerned, it's alive and kicking (as http://aptosid.com/debian/dists/unstable/InRelease might, or might not - depending on the particular point of view of the spectator, confirm, respectively refute), regardless of what wikipedia thinks about it.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
mithatOffline
Post subject: RE: aptosid Wikipedia article  PostPosted: 11.09.2014, 22:40



Joined: 2011-12-15
Posts: 25

Status: Offline
Indeed. For every opinion on the Internet, there is an equal and opposite opinion.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by Zafenio