View topic - [solved] iceweasel 4.0 repository problem :: aptosid.com :: aptosid

[solved] iceweasel 4.0 repository problem

aptosid.com Forum Index » Experimental Forums » User Scripts & Dragons

Author

Message

finotti

Post subject: [solved] iceweasel 4.0 repository problem

Posted: 15.01.2011, 19:45

Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 479

Status: Offline

Dear all,

Recently I started to have problems with Iceweasels 4 (beta)
repository.

Here is the entry:

Code:

root@debian[/etc/default]# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/iceweasel4.list 

#deb http://mozilla.debian.net/packages/ ./ 

deb http://mozilla.debian.net/packages/ experimental iceweasel-4.0

I've followed the instructions from
http://mozilla.debian.net/, which I think I had done
before, but to doublw check:

Code:

root@debian[/etc/default]# GET http://mozilla.debian.net/archive.asc | gpg --import

gpg: key 06C4AE2A: public key "Debian Mozilla team APT archive <pkg-mozilla-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>" imported

gpg: Total number processed: 1

gpg:               imported: 1  (RSA: 1)

gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found

The last line seems already weird...

Code:

root@debian[/etc/default]# gpg --check-sigs --fingerprint --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg 06C4AE2A

gpg: keyblock resource `/usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg': file open error

pub   4096R/06C4AE2A 2010-11-20 [expires: 2011-11-20]

      Key fingerprint = 85F0 6FBC 75E0 67C3 F305  C3C9 85A3 D265 06C4 AE2A

uid                  Debian Mozilla team APT archive <pkg-mozilla-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>

sig!3        06C4AE2A 2010-11-20  Debian Mozilla team APT archive <pkg-mozilla-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>

2 signatures not checked due to missing keys

root@debian[/etc/default]# gpg --export -a 06C4AE2A | sudo apt-key add -

OK

Now the error (same I had before I (re)did the above):

Code:

root@debian[/etc/default]# apt-get update

(...)

Get:7 http://mozilla.debian.net experimental Release [3,522 B]                           

Ign http://mozilla.debian.net experimental Release     

Get:8 http://mozilla.debian.net experimental/iceweasel-4.0 amd64 Packages [3,522 B]      

64% [8 Packages bzip2 0 B]bzip2: (stdin) is not a bzip2 file.

Err http://mozilla.debian.net experimental/iceweasel-4.0 amd64 Packages

  Sub-process /bin/bzip2 returned an error code (2)

Fetched 9,352 B in 31s (295 B/s)

W: GPG error: http://mozilla.debian.net experimental Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2

W: Failed to fetch http://mozilla.debian.net/packages/dists/experimental/iceweasel-4.0/binary-amd64/Packages.bz2  Sub-process /bin/bzip2 returned an error code (2)

E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

Anyone else having this problem? Any ideas?

Thanks,

Luis

Last edited by finotti on 15.01.2011, 20:47; edited 1 time in total

domicius

Post subject: RE: iceweasel 4.0 repository problem

Posted: 15.01.2011, 20:25

Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 35
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline

Try removing "packages/" from your sources file (see what happened yesterday: http://glandium.org/blog/?p=1529 - following these instructions I have no problems other than not knowing how to properly import a key without being root through the whole process or doing without "sudo" in the last step Embarassed

_________________
domicius

finotti

Post subject: RE: iceweasel 4.0 repository problem

Posted: 15.01.2011, 20:46

Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 479

Status: Offline

Thanks! That fixed it and was what the site actually said... Sorry.

domicius

Post subject: RE: iceweasel 4.0 repository problem

Posted: 15.01.2011, 20:49

Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 35
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline

Np. Glad to see it resolved. Smile

_________________
domicius

DonKult

Post subject: Re: RE: iceweasel 4.0 repository problem

Posted: 15.01.2011, 20:56

Team Member

Joined: 2010-09-02
Posts: 485

Status: Offline

domicius wrote:

following these instructions I have no problems other than not knowing how to properly import a key without being root through the whole process or doing without "sudo" in the last step Embarassed

Code:

gpg --export -a 06C4AE2A | su -c 'apt-key add -'

But please, please inform yourself what you do with this key adding! Adding a key is a security risk as from there on upgrades signed with this key are used - so if an attacker can trick you into inserting his key into your APT keyring he can from there on provide you 'upgrades' for your complete system of any kind - none, malware, whatever - and you will not notice it if he is clever enough.

Thats why the page describes how to check that the key you downloaded is signed by debian developer - assuming you are trusting this developer or another developer trusting this developer you can trust that this key is not used by an attacker and is therefore 'safe' to use.

//edit: korecd speelink

_________________
MfG. DonKult
"I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones." ~ The Doctor

domicius

Post subject: RE: Re: RE: iceweasel 4.0 repository problem

Posted: 17.01.2011, 17:43

Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 35
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline

DonKult, thanks for pointing me to that "-c" option. Funny how su is probably the command I use the most (and one of the first I learned) yet I think I have never looked into it's help/man page.

And thank you for actually turning my attention to that part of the page which describes how to check the trust path (actually link to another one) - I never really understood these keys that I've been importing (although I've been very wary from whom I download unofficial packages - and it was usually (even though rarely) from guys like Mike but doing something without understanding it, and what's more, creating a habit of doing it without thinking about it is sure an accident waiting to happen).

Regarding this specific case, using that Pathfinder tool, not only can I not find a path I could trust but I can't find any path other than: http://webware.lysator.liu.se/jc/wotsap/wots/latest/paths/0x54FD2A58-0xA6AA8C72.png (it confuses me most that it reports key 06C4AE2A as not found) - as far as I can understand, that tool can't really help me if I don't have my own key (which I still don't) or some other that I trust. Or I'm doing something wrong here... Smile

But I started reading (and understanding more) about all this so I might actually understand all of this at some point. Very Happy

EDIT: I'm finally getting the hang of this and finding some useful data from that tool. And I answered my question from above - it can help me even if I don't have my own key.

_________________
domicius

All times are GMT - 12 Hours

aptosid.com Forum Index » Experimental Forums » User Scripts & Dragons

Menu

Rootserver Sponsor

Donations

News

Blog