| Author |
Message |
spacepenguin
|
|
Post subject: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 06:10
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 98
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
|
|
| Just installed the new 38-kernel but it's not possible to generate the nvidia module, always gives a failed message. I use the frickelplatz 270.26 nvidia-kernel-source. |
_________________ Susan | Hardware: SysProfile | 32bit
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
devil
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 06:40
|
|

Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
not an upgrade-warning, as .38 is not released. moved to dragons.
greetz
devil |
Last edited by devil on 15.03.2011, 09:22; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
towo
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 06:41
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 488
Location: Pößneck / Thüringen
Status: Offline
|
|
| The aptosid Kernel has a patch in, which prevent the nvidia kernelmodule to build. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
devil
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 06:47
|
|

Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline
|
|
ups, missed the .38 release.
nvidia qualifies for dragons anyways. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
blackhole
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 08:05
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 110
Status: Offline
|
|
| Same problem here with nvidia 256.53 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
clubex
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 08:42
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 95
Status: Offline
|
|
Same here.
The error I get is "include/generated/autoconf.h or include/config/auto.conf is missing" and suggests to insert and recompile.
infobash -v3
Host/Kernel/OS "westfield" running Linux 2.6.37-3.slh.2-aptosid-amd64 x86_64 [ sidux 2008-04 Πόντος - kde-lite - (200812222256) ]
CPU Info 2x AMD Athlon II X2 240 1024 KB cache flags( sse3 ht nx lm svm ) clocked at [ 800.000 MHz ]
Videocard nVidia C61 [GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a] X.Org 1.9.4.901 [ 1680x1050@50.0hz ]
Network cards nVidia MCP61
Processes 136 | Uptime 12min | Memory 657.5/1758.8MB | HDD Hitachi HDS72168 Size 82GB (81%used) | GLX Renderer GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a/PCI/SSE2 | GLX Version 2.1.2 NVIDIA 260.19.44 | Client Shell | Infobash v3.35
. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
ibgb
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 09:06
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 42
Status: Offline
|
|
|
towo wrote:
The aptosid Kernel has a patch in, which prevent the nvidia kernelmodule to build.
Gotta admit, that spooked me a little.
Removed the kernel meta package. Think I'll stay with 2.6.37 for a little while until it hopefully gets sorted out |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
towo
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 09:13
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 488
Location: Pößneck / Thüringen
Status: Offline
|
|
| The patch is 0019-BKL-That-s-all-folks.patch which is purging all bkl-related headers, which are useless now, since the kernel is build without bkl. The problem now is, nvidia noes not need bkl itself, but the module are including some headers, which are not exist after applying this patch. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
blackhole
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 10:48
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 110
Status: Offline
|
|
| I understand that nvidia driver is closed source, but aptosid devs should take into account that a lot of aptosid users are using nvidia... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
towo
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 10:53
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-13
Posts: 488
Location: Pößneck / Thüringen
Status: Offline
|
|
Full ack.
I can't imagine, why aptosid includes this patch, which is proposed to aplyed upstream in 2.6.39 or maybe 2.6.40.
That's full against the users of aptosid. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
micha_52
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 11:13
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 18
Location: Nordstemmen
Status: Offline
|
|
I fully agree with you towo.
A kernel that does not support my nvidia card is useless for me |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
mirix
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 12:14
|
|

Joined: 2010-10-25
Posts: 28
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yep. My problem is that I really need a recent driver in order to profit from CUDA. Therefore my only option is installing the proprietary driver downloaded from the NVIDIA website. If the Aptosid kernel is not going to work, I will try to install the vanilla kernel (again). |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
blackhole
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 13:50
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 110
Status: Offline
|
|
| I also I need nvidia for VDPAU hardware acceleration. Using nouveau is not an option. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 13:56
|
|
Moderator

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 464
|
|
|
mirix wrote:
Yep. My problem is that I really need a recent driver in order to profit from CUDA. Therefore my only option is installing the proprietary driver downloaded from the NVIDIA website. If the Aptosid kernel is not going to work, I will try to install the vanilla kernel (again).
I'm not using nvidia driver now.
But if it does not actually use BKL, but just the module does not build without some kernel option,
then isn't it easier to fix the source of module than building a private kernel for that?
(assuming that the source for module, to be locally compiled is open source and downloadable...
and the closed source driver itself does not deends on the kernel option..) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
browe
|
|
Post subject: RE: nividia-kernel-source does not build with 38-kernel
Posted: 15.03.2011, 14:00
|
|

Joined: 2010-09-12
Posts: 140
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
| My suggestion is to stick with 2.6.37 and to opt out of automatic kernel upgrades. I'm sure that slh will issue a new kernel momentarily that fixes the problem... if not perhaps we can encourage towo to do some kernel magic. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|